|
Ann McKechin MP today spoke out against the Tory-Lib Dem government's draconian housing benefit cuts which will cause serious hardship in Glasgow communities.
The Glasgow North MP condemned the housing benefit caps of £250 for a one-bed property and £400 for four or more bedrooms, which will hit the most vulnerable people in communities up and down the country. And, if you’re stuck on Jobseekers Allowance for over a year you will have a further 10% of your HB taken away, notwithstanding the fact that there are fewer job vacancies than there are jobseekers. The cap will hit the 200,000 single, childless jobseekers and low-paid, hardest. Unemployed people will now have to find the difference out of their weekly JSA payments of £65.45 (higher rate for over 22-year olds) – which are also being squeezed. A single jobseeker in Glasgow North burgh constituency paying the average £400 per month in private rent could be left with as little as £112 per month to pay for all bills and food. Private rents are generally significantly higher than social landlord rents. In Glasgow North 20.1% of people live in private rents, in Glasgow Central it is 25.6%, both built up areas are well above the city’s average of 13.8% private rent dwellers. Ann McKechin MP warned that the housing benefit cuts amounted to a regressive broadside against the low-paid and unemployed, struggling with high rents in our community: "This is about hitting the poorest and most vulnerable hardest. Many of my constituents on low incomes have to stump up private rents in excess of £400 per month in order to keep a roof over their head. When the housing benefit caps come in, many people in this city will face primitive choices between heating and eating through the winter, or ending up homeless.
"There is something truly stomach churning about a cabinet, 23 out of 29 members of which are millionaires in their own right - forcing those who depend on housing benefit to stump up more rent money out of low incomes. "Housing Benefit is not some cushy number for people in posh areas of London, as portrayed by the Tories and Lib Dems. It is largely claimed by very vulnerable people in subsistence situations who struggle with the cost of living on very low incomes. "This Government's choice, for it is a political choice not a necessity, is to hit the weakest hardest and it is inexplicably cruel. "This is not just bad government, it is cruel government."
Organisations such as Inside Housing have warned that the caps will lead to a 'ghettoisation' of benefit claimants, causing serious social dislocation. The Chartered Institute of Housing and the National Housing Federation warned that significant numbers of people on jobseekers allowance live in social housing and cutting their benefit could lead to escalating arrears and hardship. People occupying a property the government thinks is too big will have to make up the difference from or move. For all the misery this government's caps will cause, they will only 'save' £70 million. The biggest saving (£490 million according to the 2010 Budget Red Book Policy Costings p41) will come from restricting working age entitlements in the 'social sector' (council housing and housing associations). Ann McKechin MP added: "Millions across Scotland and the UK will now face a miserable challenge to keep a roof over their head, as a direct result of the arbitrary decision to give a 10% kick in the teeth for people unlucky enough to be stuck on JSA for a year and to cap housing benefit, upon which many of the most vulnerable depend."
|